Talk:P-value

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the P-value article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 3 months

Statistics Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Statistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of statistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.StatisticsWikipedia:WikiProject StatisticsTemplate:WikiProject StatisticsStatistics articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Mathematics Mid‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Null hypothesis vs. "our hypothesis"

I am referring to the sentence:

As our statistical hypothesis will, by definition, state some property of the distribution, the null hypothesis is the default hypothesis under which that property does not exist.

In subsequent examples, the Null hypothesis is always stated explicitly, e.g. as "data comes from the standard normal distribution", "the coin is fair", etc. There is no example when a property of the distribution is stated and the null hypothesis would be defined as non-existence or a logical negation of the property. Furthermore, "data comes not from N(0,1)" makes little sense as "our statistical hypothesis" because it is too unspecific.

This is especially confusing in the beginning when the reader does not know what is going to be tested.

Would it be better to stick with the Null hypothesis only, state that the test can reject it or not reject it and leave the logic implications to the reader? Or perhaps add a clear example where we can infer acceptance of "our hypothesis" based on rejection of the null hypothesis? Alexander Shekhovtsov (talk) 12:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

p-value, P-value, p value, P value?

What is the best way to use here? I have seen all of these. 130.226.41.15 (talk) 11:54, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is addressed at P-value#cite_note-2.

However, all three examples are from the USA. There should be more balance, preferably with an international source (ISO standard, or IMS, or IMU, or ISI?), or at least from some other countries/regions.

Personally I prefer lowercase ("p-value" or "p value"), which I believe is more common, except when p has already been assigned to another variable. Italics should always be used for the "p"!

—DIV (1.145.104.186 (talk) 01:50, 14 August 2024 (UTC))[reply]

Unnecessary hedging: "Usually, T is a test statistic."

As a reader, if I read "usually" that suggests an exception. But there is no counter-example. A p-value is ALWAYS derived from a a test statistic. Therefore, Wikipedia should drop "usually" in this sentence.

I propose the sentence say "As stated above, T is a test statistic." This matches a sentence earlier in the article, this sentence is present: "The p-value is a function of the chosen test statistic and is therefore a random variable." DavidCJames (talk) 22:09, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Be bold. —DIV (1.145.104.186 (talk) 01:54, 14 August 2024 (UTC))[reply]